A University should accept male and female students equally in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
University quota for students based on gender is a recent issue in many countries. While some believe that males and female should be accepted equally in every subject, other think oppositely. In my opinion universities should not accept both genders equally in every subject. Analyzing the facts that females generally don’t pursue careers after university and suitability of certain subjects for a particular gender will prove our point.
First of all, it is a renowned fact the most of female graduates do not pursue their careers. The priorities change with family situations or other social or personal issues. For example, a recent survey in Pakistan shows that up to 75% female medical graduates don’t work at all. With the current shortage of skilled workers and high amount of financial support by government, it is wrong practice. In such cases it’s a better option to give more admission to more deserving students. Thus lack of use of university resources in a productive manner supports our stance.
Secondly, some subjects have particular skills which are better for a particular gender. For example looking at nursing, we expect a motherly care from a nurse in the hospital and females can provide such care much better than the males. Similarly mechanical engineering and petroleum engineering are the fields which demand high levels of endurance and working in rugged fields. Although women can perform these duties, males will naturally be choice for such subject. Thus choice of gender for certain skill prove our point.
In conclusion, many fields are suitable for a particular gender and universities have to make sure that their services don’t get wasted. In my opinion universities should not accept males and females equally in ever subject. In future, government should develop strict laws against the people who don’t pursue their careers when governments finance their studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive manner" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hus lack of use of university resources in a productive manner supports our stance. Secondly, some su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...e such care much better than the males. Similarly mechanical engineering and petroleum en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...l naturally be choice for such subject. Thus choice of gender for certain skill prov...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der for certain skill prove our point. In conclusion, many fields are suitable ...
^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es and females equally in ever subject. In future, government should develop stric...
^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...es and females equally in ever subject. In future, government should develop strict laws ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35081967213 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67235441087 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4740417283 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22418048833 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819086844063 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103524680558 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146167847376 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957029294995 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.