Without any doubt, society is divided into two groups as per the distinct mindset of different people and therefore, this has become debatable issue whether university students must pay their full fees nor they are eligible to get scholarships or grants either from government or non-government organizations because it will help only to improve their lifestyle after completion of graduation.
Moving towards the first point of this argument, first of all, we cannot completely oppose the students those complete their professional education benefits themselves only although it helps the community which they belong too. For example, MBBS student can offer their special knowledge to treat seasonal disease such as flue and cold. Secondly, secondary education helps to maintain the quality of life of a common people on the other hand, young professionals are the back bone of a developed nations so that country could have come in leadership position globally. America, China and RUSSIA are best examples.
When we come to the second portion of this debate, first point is that improve the standard of living of the public is the main responsibility of an authority so it is crucial to give free education and amenities up to Graduation, however, if government or university can provide the grants, discount or scholarships for at least in Medical education, definitely it could have a massive change in the health sector of that country because healthy peoples are the wealth of every country. For example, Canada, Germany and France have invested lot of public money in Medicinal development, thus, they are the best in public’s health matters
To conclude, spending public money in education or innovation field is not a wastage particularly for higher education but it will bounce back to the society in either way. so I strongly agree if any nation can spend money for graduates it will acceptable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...unce back to the society in either way. so I strongly agree if any nation can spen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20779220779 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82445140178 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 146.840847093 49.4020404114 297% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.5 106.682146367 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.5 20.7667163134 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.875 7.06120827912 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165438961571 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615379296768 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481903132244 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956947459627 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395099450551 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.4 13.0946893788 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.45 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.3001002004 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.