The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, mobile phones have been used worldwide owing to its many modern and useful features. Some people believe that using cell phones is harmful to society and should be prohibited in specific places as smoking. While I accept that sometimes mobile phones usage can have negative effects on public areas, I believe that it is real necessary for people and so should not be banned.
On the one hand, it is a fact that using cell phones in public places where need to remain silent can disturb to other people. For example, in libraries, if you make a loud call or get a sudden ringtone from an incoming call, you can interrupt the reading process of others. This is considered impolite and not respectful other people nearby. Thus, cell phones should be set options for different cases to have not an influence on those around.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why mobile phones usage should not be prohibited. Firstly, it has many exciting apps which help people have a life easily like camera, send emails, browse the Web, play music and so on. It allows people to capture moments in their lifetime, support their work and entertain in their free time. Secondly, it also allows people to keep in touch with their loved anywhere or in the special case of emergency. For instance, distant lovers who do not live beside together can make a call or a video call every day. Looking many benefits metioned above, it is clear that mobile phones become indispensable devices of people.
In conclusion, it is true that cell phones can be antisocial. But it is not as bad as smoking ,so it should not be banned in some public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phones have been used worldwide owing to its many modern and useful features. Som...
^^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me people believe that using cell phones is harmful to society and should be proh...
^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eve that it is real necessary for people and so should not be banned. On the one...
^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Thus, cell phones should be set options for different cases to have not an influ...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c and so on. It allows people to capture moments in their lifetime, support their...
^^
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e phones become indispensable devices of people. In conclusion, it is true that ...
^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...isocial. But it is not as bad as smoking ,so it should not be banned in some publi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69072164948 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33382166974 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573883161512 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4334750908 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308437289391 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102471403663 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809372060084 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197923145326 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762400973768 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.