The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about whether mobile phones should be treated like smoking in certain places or not. While I agree thet mobile phones have negative influence on society, I would argue that the positive aspects of mobile phones are more significant.
There are some reason why using mobile phones should be prohibited in public places. The first reason is that the use of mobile phones is weakening social bond. Today, people are likely to spend hours on mobile phones so they do not have time to socialize, which resulting in the weak links between individuals in society. This problem could lead to some serious consequences suc as people becoming more heartless or the rise of antisocial behaviors. The second reason is that using mobile phones in public could put users in dangerous situations. When people is to concentrate on their phone, they often unaware of surroundings. For example, many accidents occurr every year because pedestrians are busy texting while crossing the road.
However, the positive aspects of mobile phones outweigh its harmful effects. Firstly, in modern society, mobile phones are great tool to socialize. For example, students who study abroad can easily communicate with their parents and friends via applications such as Skype or Viber. Furthermore, with the rise of technology, people can use mobile phones for online shopping, manage personal finance or playing games things that we could not do before or took a lot of efforts. Additionally, the use of mobile phones doesn't affect people's health directly compared to smoking. Smoking in public places not only brings harmful effects to smokers but also to other citizens around them.
In conclusion, while I agree that mobile phones could be antisocial sometimes, I believe they should not be banned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Additionally, the use of mobile phones doesnt affect peoples health directly compared...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25172413793 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55814894805 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.128006939 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410765460728 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145582069965 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922224342711 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276164492721 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359656438464 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.