People have different views about whether companies should have responsibility for local community or not. While I agree that the top priority of companies is to generate profits, I believe that they should also have social responsibilities.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why businesses should only focus on their work. Firstly, not every companies can afford to give the society a hand. As the majority of businesses are small scale so they usually not financial stable, which means they are not capable of providing support to the community. Secondly, many people believe that taking care of the society should be governments' job. Businesses already contribute to the development of the society by paying their taxes so it is governments' responsibilities to allocate the money to enhance citizens' lives. Furthermore, if companies have to carry social responsibilities, they might face fund shortage problems when trying to expand their businesses.
On the other hand, I would argue that apart from making money, companies should also have to take care of the society. The first reason is that societies can gain benefits from the time and resources provided by companies. For example, many businesses help building local parks or libraries in their neighborhood. As a result, such positive activities can improve citizens' lives significantly. The second reason is that helping the society will also benefit companies' business. By conducting works such as charities or volunteering jobs for local community, staffs can become closer with the local residents and, therefore, gaining reputation for their companies. Getting company's image enhanceed will certainly have positive impact to their businesses.
In conclusion, I believe that beside profits pupose, companies should also have social responsibilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to build' or 'build'.
Suggestion: to build; build
...nies. For example, many businesses help building local parks or libraries in their neigh...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53928571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03550209342 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582142857143 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0967717497 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203781587574 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708646004998 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756665131393 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15654798941 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523256295309 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.