Blood sports (like bull-fighting or cock-fighting) have become a hot topic for debate in recent years. Many people now say these sports are cruel to animals, of little cultural value, and should be banned.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last decade, blood sports, such as bull-fighting, cock fighting, dog fighting and the like deserve particular attention. Many people hold the opinion that blood sports are atrocious and brutal, contribute to cultural degradation and must be forbidden. From my point of view blood sports should be banned.
There are two main problems with blood sports. Firstly, animals which take part in this kind of spectacles are treated harshly. A particularly good example of this is bulls which are confined in small and dark cages for a couple of days without food and water, in some cases dying before going out to the arena. Secondly, those kinds of sport carry different types of crimes such as illegally bets, money laundering, and others. In Mexico or Canary Islands, where cockfighting is still popular, many people use the fights as a facade for placing illegal bets or making drug deals.
It is true however, in many countries some blood sports considered to be traditional, for instance fox hunting in England, hawk hunting in Mongolia, cock fighting in several nations. But actually it was proved that some of them are not older then a century. For example bull-fighting in Spain does not belong to Spanish culture but French brought it around a hundred years ago.
To sum up briefly, in blood sports animals are treated terribly and other crimes, such as gambling or money laundering, are encouraged. Although people argue that they are part of traditional culture, many such sports are actually quite new. So I am against these sports because I believe animals have dignity and have the same rights as human beings and should not be treated unfairly and cruelly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'older than'?
Suggestion: older than
...it was proved that some of them are not older then a century. For example bull fighting in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...brought it around a hundred years ago. To sum up briefly, in blood sports anima...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, briefly, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, in some cases, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97872340426 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45713720891 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8325134754 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310805015747 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096382381327 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065265258491 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187827457926 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648051490687 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.