The phenomenon of recently changing habits of children toward sports & streaming content come to the forefront. Some feel that children should not watch the same content or play similar sports which their acquaintances. However, I agree with those who say that children should have the liberty that they can select what they want to view. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for a viewpoint on the matter.
Regarding those who feel children should not watch the same content as their friends, there exist valid reason the main justification is that imitating, put a kibosh on children own knowledge. And, they believe that this will make their children seditious. According to Dallas report based on facts observed by many data artists when they test the thought level of school children who adopt some activities which their friends usually not able to perform well in their life when they must take the decision alone.
Nevertheless, I cannot hold that opinion in good conscious. The fact is that children become more proactive and bone up by sharing same activities. The Harvard reported that Austrian citizen who took early initiative, an estimated 100,000 children with identical habits perform well in their life. Because of that, we have such a personality who create exceptionally devices which help us get a noise-free environment even though we are on a landmass where there is a huge noise.
In sum, if people put a moratorium on a belief that sharing each other habits in sports and streaming content not let perform children and pitches in, normal people like others and I can bring change. I hope that soon everyone understands this thing and let their children foster in their own way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for a viewpoint on th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ationale for a viewpoint on the matter. Regarding those who feel children should...
^^^^
Line 2, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...when they must take the decision alone. Nevertheless, I cannot hold that opinion...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04081632653 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59591972057 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58843537415 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0643121833 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204085385372 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783718879493 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724102478309 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121360457992 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449586362062 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.