Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, technological advance has a predominant impact in many countries, which is purchasing the same product almost everywhere in the world. In my opinion, I sincerely believe that modern development is widely detrimental to culture and traditions throughout the world.
Firstly, some societies have their characteristics and that could be either a traditional food or conventional wear.By buying a multinational food, the traditional food will lose its popularity, as well as the attribute of society. This could happen because of the prevalence of global food brand such as MacDonald’s. Moreover, if a substantial portion of people tends to have the same clothes as in the other places, the conventional wear will be disappeared. For example. In Japan, the heritage of their ancestors which is kimono may be gradually receded.
In fact, it poses a threat not only to tourism industry but also on job opportunities. For instance, when tourists visit many places and find the same items as in their country, they will feel either bored or disappointed due to they cannot find souvenirs that will remind them of the place they visited. Accordingly, this inevitably leads to decrease the number of tourists, and vacancies in tourism industry also decline sharply. This eventually put many people out of work.
In conclusion, the counterproductive of purchasing the same products cannot be overlooked. Differences are playing an important role because every community has a special legacy. As a result, this is a glaring omission for both culture and traditions since people try to have the same item anywhere all over the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...a traditional food or conventional wear.By buying a multinational food, the tradit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35769230769 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17956446349 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603846153846 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.220884228 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3076923077 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111624914155 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400170122051 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322764639267 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735988896487 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380860223435 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.