Developments in technology make lives somehow realistic by letting people to purchase anything they require even it is not accesible in their living spot. In my view, it is going to be huge step to the unity. Furthermore, it helps to overcome crosscultural issues. On the other hand, it significantly impacts on politics and economics by providing a competetive market.
Bying high quality products is the highlighted feauters of today’s world which is facilitated by in charge companies. Indeed, good quality items do not find in every countries; so, by transfering them to these regions every nationalities have access to them. In fact, descrimination becomes meaningless. Moreover, by using same kind of items in all around a world, life styles will change which causes syncing with other cultures easier.
Sharing same goods is one of the controvertial chanllenges for both economists and politicians; because, if it happen widely and mutually, it will help countires to get involve in eachother industry. To be pricise, when people starting to use same kind of items; in parallel, the governors start to have more negotiations with eachother. For instance, when iranian people buy German applience brands, it may encourage Germanies to buy persian rug in future.
In conclusion, sharing same objects in all over the world impacts on lives in several ways. Firstly, it causes the unity either in culture or in lifestyle and descrimination is faded away. Secondly, it has the ability to increases imports and exports fairly which leads economics and politics to the brighter future
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... products is the highlighted feauters of today's world which is facilitated ...
^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
...nomists and politicians; because, if it happen widely and mutually, it will help count...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... encourage Germanies to buy persian rug in future. In conclusion, sharing same objects i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ics and politics to the brighter future .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29133858268 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02496087779 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1887764582 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147176751598 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378525003446 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344307948549 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706511867637 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292052328947 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.