Cycling is more environmental friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased?

Essay topics:

Cycling is more environmental friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased?

In the modern world, cycling is arguably an optimum form of transport as it is consistent with the universal principle of promoting eco-friendly products. However, it is worth mentioning that cycling is not prevalent in many regions. The following paragraphs will discuss the reasons why this is the case and some effective measures to make the bicycle a more popular means of transport.

There are several reasons why cycling is not popular in many places. First of all, people in big cities are more likely to travel using private vehicles or public transports rather than bicycles, since cycling...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 9 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
... On the other hand, it is essential to taking several effective steps to raise the po...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduce'?
Suggestion: reduce
... pollution. However, it is important to reducing people's reliance on vehicles and ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, first of all, in the first place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28052805281 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91089483098 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623762376238 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2198102444 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259070033217 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08826297206 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730494533573 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142060895984 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697395867714 0.056905535591 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

it is important to reducing people’s reliance
it is important to reduce people’s reliance

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9.0
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 303 350
No. of Characters: 1554 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.172 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.129 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.805 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.308 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.329 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.334 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.569 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5