Employer sometimes ask people apply for jobs personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Employers are quite demanding and at the same time are very sensitive regarding their employees. They tend to require more information regarding the likes and dislikes or strengths and weaknesses. Many employers judge the employees willingness to work for the particular organization. Many think that this is a valid observation while others do not agree. I will discuss the both perceptions below.
Employers require applicants to provide their personal information to justify their position for the relevant role. For instance, if the job is stressful and require late sittings then a married man or woman may not be compatible for the particular position as they have their own commitments back home. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that a married person could be more qualified and sensible compare to non-married and capable to handle the pressure in work time without any duress.
For other hand, some job specification require to have interest in sports or other recreational activities. For example, a company is dealing in football supplies, in this case, an employee should have some knowledge and concern about the football. While other believe that creating interest is not necessary and one who does not have much idea can work as competent as who does have and its mere discrimination on the face of interest and hobby.
To sum up, there is no particular thought about the right or wrong on asking the personal information. Employers raise their voice because they need employees who deem fit for the company while the people who confront this viewpoint claim that it is mere exploitation against them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...nd weaknesses. Many employers judge the employees willingness to work for the particular ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it is mere exploitation against them.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, while, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19318181818 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85855881015 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1165990131 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.461538462 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294182388378 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927473011903 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577262343667 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162004998615 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596140432625 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.