Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree.
discuss both views and give your opinion.
Providing personal details is a step of a recruitment process. Accordingly, it has controversially prompted a substantial proportion of people to have a vigorous debate whether it is beneficial or it is not relevant. In my opinion, I sincerely believe that while applying for a job, applicants should provide not only vocational experience but also personal details.
Firstly, one of the contingent reason is assisting the employer to select an appropriate candidate. For example, single applicants as a marital status have neither responsibilities nor compelling circumstances that impede them from travelling outside since many jobs nowadays require from their employees to travel on a daily basis. Hence, either married or single consider an influential factor. Furthermore. By providing information such as hobbies and interests, the company will organise a convenient event for their employees who share the same interest. As a result, the employer can create an ideal environment in order to not only improve teamwork but also collaborative skills.
One the other hand, in some cultures, providing marital status while applying for a job seems to be a violation of privacy. The recruiter could acquire either education qualification or vocational experience rather than single mother or divorced because they are afraid that these details might be disclosed. The candidates especially women, therefore, deter from giving an information related to personal life as it tends to be a private concern.
In conclusion, giving personal information when filling the job application, is still an argumentative topic. Nevertheless, I think that in order to select a qualified worker, all information including personal details should be provided.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... single consider an influential factor. Furthermore. By providing information such as hobbi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64772727273 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24832857706 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.002555063 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.692307692 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7692307692 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274894712912 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848302944644 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425675076285 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149486454416 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201004945553 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.