Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both views and your opinion.
Sharing of personal information such as hobbies, marital status are beneficial or not is a matter of debate. Though some people think that it has relevance in many, others have different views regarding this matter. I think that general information like hobbies and interests can be shared in a professional sector, but information like marital status should not be disclosed as it has less impact on the organizations.
There is no denial that sharing personal information with the employers have many benefits. Information related hobbies and interests are used to organize cultural events in an organization, which help to minimize stress, workload of the employees. Moreover, workings in a team for fun activities bring closeness among employees. Apart from this, many jobs require a form of aptitude test that determines a person’s own characteristics. For example, a person with an analytical background might be interested in playing strategy games like chess. It helps to determine the recruiters to fit him to the analytical tasks.
However, the opposition put forward some convincing arguments. Asking information about someone’s relationship status may sometime create uncomfortable situation within the workplace. For instance, in a survey, which is conducted by the “Hindustan Times”, it has been observed that 50% of working women does not want to share their marital status because of ample of reasons. First, divorce women do not want to talk about their personal problems. Second, most of the companies prefer single women because they reckon that single women will work with more dedication and enthusiasm. In addition, an individual following a certain religion might be disqualified, even though his qualifications match the vacancy, on the basis of discrimination. Therefore, it creates an opinion-based outcome, which could damage the job in the long run.
To recapitulate, both of the aforementioned perspectives have merit. Nevertheless, I am of the opinion that hobbies and interest can be disclosed, but information related to marital status or religion could be remain undisclosed while applying for a job.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54242424242 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25966670033 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3148457693 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.611111111 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309468904357 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813081578978 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052701609061 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17808506538 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340089220128 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.