Every country should have a free health service, even if tlJis means that
the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service
because they are too expensive.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Health services are elementary privilege to every individual of a country. Government ought to be concerned about medical treatments. They need to allocate heavy budget for health related issues as, residents may pay a handsome amount in shape of tax. Thus, I disagree with the statement; advance medical facilities need to be available for inhabitants.
Emergency treatments need to be addressed at priority level. As an illustration, I would like to give an example of road accident. At that particular time a person may need modern treatment, which may be expensive but requirement is significant for a patient. Hence, government has to allocate money for advance treatments.
In addition to above, I would like to support another group of citizens, who may also need advance treatments for their better health. To give a clear example, aged group of people above sixty in other word retired person whether they are retired from their services or any business. Such people have more health issues and less attention. Even though, such group of people could not pay their expensive operation bills. Consequently, a government may play their vital role to support them as they have have paid high taxes at their working time.
To conclude, my above discussion health is most concerning topic. Day by day advance technology provide us facilities but these are expensive. So government may provide such benefits at free of cost . Especially, those people who are more deserving. Government needs to define its duty to mange to provide modern technological treatment to their inhabitants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better health. To give a clear example, aged group of people above sixty in othe...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rson whether they are retired from their services or any business. Such people ha...
^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...heir vital role to support them as they have have paid high taxes at their working time. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...vital role to support them as they have have paid high taxes at their working time. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s facilities but these are expensive. So government may provide such benefits at ...
^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ay provide such benefits at free of cost . Especially, those people who are more d...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gical treatment to their inhabitants.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, thus, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24705882353 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87839473492 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1458139787 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3333333333 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183395314215 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576734543231 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462139810431 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113935216438 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529504508752 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.