Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent years, problems of transportation are increased tremendously. Many countries are now looking alternate methods to resolve these issues. Few of them have successfully implemented other massive transportation systems, like, Japan. I believe that spend more money on other arrangements like trains is useful. The are two main reasons underlying for my opinion. First, it eases the road traffic congestion. Second, investments in other infrastructures will increase job opportunities.
Chock-a-block traffic is the foremost issue raise in every country. Most of them are suffering from worst traffic jams, especially, in peak hours, where the traffic is literally crawling, like in my country, Pakistan. To remove this problem, it is necessary to invest money in railways. There are couple of reasons behind this. First, it reduces number of vehicles on the roads. Second, it aids in diminishing encroachments in traffic rules. Also, most nationals prefer travelling by train because they like the sight-seeings from windows. Other travel because they reach to their destinations early before time.
In addition to that, focusing on creating new ways of transportation help the economy of any country to flourish. Many unemployed people would have opportunities to earn money for them and feeding extra mouths of his family. Such projects last for at least couple of years which means employees would not need to worry for employments. Afterwards, these systems require maintenance. Therefore, workforce still require to keep this department moving in smoother way.
At the conclusion of my essay, railways play significant role. It reduces traffic on the roads which means cars and tramps passengers have more ways to travel. It also avoids unnecessary stoppage on traffic lights. Railway organisation give employment opportunities thus, help individuals to grow and their society as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'from the worst'.
Suggestion: from the worst
...ery country. Most of them are suffering from worst traffic jams, especially, in peak hours...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... remove this problem, it is necessary to invest money in railways. There are coup...
^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o their destinations early before time. In addition to that, focusing on creatin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...which means employees would not need to worry for employments. Afterwards, these systems ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: keeping
...nce. Therefore, workforce still require to keep this department moving in smoother way....
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raffic lights. Railway organisation give employment opportunities thus, help indi...
^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to grow and their society as a whole.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, still, therefore, thus, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58965517241 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06594388249 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5429094424 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.5416666667 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.0833333333 20.7667163134 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0668926099035 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197151800113 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311614086466 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0383610368119 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00886320083233 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.25 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.