Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world some people say that this cannot
be changed. Others believe that actions can be taken to bring about change.
Discuss both views and give opinion.
Illegal activities are the reason behind the extinction of wildlife. To save the wildlife, it is believed by a certain populace that steps must be taken, while others with a contrarian view, argue that it is already too late and nothing can be done to maintain the ecological balance. Whilst a discussion of both these views is worthwhile. In my opinion, governments should take appropriate actions in order to save flora and fauna.
The humans have already exploited the wildlife, that cannot be reversed. In other words, already many species are either on the verge of extinction or are already extinct. According to recent research, for instance, we have already lost more than 1000 species because of human interference. This is the reason why many people believe that nothing can be done since it is already too late.
However, on the other hand, strict actions and laws from governments from all around the globe will help to save the species. Wildlife sanctuaries should be secured in such a way, that anyone entering this area must face legal actions. This will stop the activities by visitors such as fire camping and hunting. For instance, the recent bushfire in Australia was because of a half-burnt cigarette thrown by someone in the forest. If no one would have been allowed to enter in that area, in the first place, millions of animals would not have died. It is just an example of one scenario, that can make an impact, so we should not lose hopes of saving wildlife.
To conclude, although people may vary in their opinion, I believe that strict action must be taken by the government to make this planet a safe place for all other species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...own by someone in the forest. If no one would have been allowed to enter in that area, in the f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion, in other words, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82867132867 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51706727345 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5451921505 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254704930574 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08030953368 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612674374529 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160934295149 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044035792893 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.