The increase in the number of privately-owned cars is having a negative impact on both our towns and the environment. What can individuals and the government do to reduce this problem?
It is an undeniable fact that today means of transportation such as cars are readily accessible almost to everyone. This essay will explain in detail how the ascending number of private cars is causing air pollution and traffic jams and how people and the government can mitigate these issues by raising the taxes for fuel and passing a law to use public vehicles to commute are potential solutions.
As a starting point of discussion, one consequence of this phenomenon would definitely be air pollution. This is because these cars consume a significant amount of fuel and as a result, emit toxic gases in the air, which pollutes our towns and environment. Consequently, people breathe these toxins via air and suffer from a variety of respiratory ailments. Take smog as an example, which is one of the most threatening air problems these days, as many cases of respiration issues have already been reported worldwide. To combat this matter, both individuals and governments should play their role by using cars needlessly and by applying higher taxes to the fuel, respectively.
Not only there is an issue of air pollution, but traffic congestion is also a paramount problem to take into account. Since most of the people can afford their own cars today, higher traffic jams are on the roads. For this reason, people are unable to reach their destinations on time. To tackle this issue, governments should enforce a law of using public transport for the traveling purpose despite the profession, age, and gender. Once the masses will abide by this law, there will be fewer traffic jams and thus, they will reach their destinations on time.
In conclusion, air pollution and traffic congestion are the two significant problems because of private cars; however, these problems could be resolved via not using cars unnecessarily, by applying higher taxes on fuel, and a law-enforcement to use public means of transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 489, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...s will abide by this law, there will be fewer traffic jams and thus, they will reach their de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10094637224 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84698174533 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529968454259 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0837380684 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196791996917 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688321976376 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488993161568 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118826749913 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322215535319 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.