Internet crime is increasing rapidly as more and more people are using internet for financial transactions. What can be done to tackle this problem?
In recent years, many people prefer utilizing plastic money instead of paper ones, which is more convenient and simpler. However, the internet offences have escalated tremendously as the individuals are opting for cyberspace to withdraw funds. This essay will highlight how such issues could be solved by impenetrable reliability and an instalment of cameras in all such places.
To begin with, people usually save their earnings in the bank for safety. In other words, it is the responsibility of such organizations to incorporate solid security regarding such transactions, and only allow access of the owner to such accounts. To cite an example, a few years ago in India, such stealing of capitals from the banks by the hacker was prevalent and later concluded to inculcate only an account holder to obtain the information on any withdrawal and maintain a sturdy security system, which has abated such misdeeds remarkably since a couple of years now. Therefore, to reduce such crimes, security is an essential factor to look upon.
Furthermore, strict law and punishment should be implemented by the government against hackers. So that individuals will fear before involving themselves in such an offence. In China, after the government introduce lifelong imprisonment to such criminals, hacking has been mitigated to a lower per cent than ever before. Thus, punishing the offender accordingly and strictly will create a hesitation within the offender to commit any crime.
Who would want to lose all their savings to such offenders? For that, strong safety and a rigorous law might be benefitted in reducing crimes regarding financial withdrawal. It is the responsibility of mainly the banks, where the people accumulate their finances, and the government, to whom the people rely mostly on the justice, to look after such issues in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nted by the government against hackers. So that individuals will fear before involving ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30169491525 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92325665556 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4407739713 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109273681437 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393449563651 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420536379646 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739450036075 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531155186998 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.