It is better for children to read by using online materials or by using printed material Discuss and give your own opinion

The community has been changed by the arrival of modern technologies such as the internet, computers, and mobile phones. The methods of education have also been changed significantly, which created different attitudes towards this. Many people believe that the benefits of printed books outweigh online materials. Although I appreciate the advantageous aspects of online study materials.
On the one hand, printed materials will decrease the risk of being distracted by other types of activities, such as social media platforms and games on our mobile phones and computers. Additionally, printed materials are normally provided by teachers or organizations, which are organized from analyzed and formatted information for effective study. Consumption of printed materials also encourages students to read books as a hobby. Furthermore, printed materials are totally safe for human healthy, while online ones can cause some eye illnesses.
On the other hand, there are unlimited numbers of online education sources about different subjects and topics. Students can find the best suitable ones for their studies and learning skills by using searching engines such as Google. Furthermore, students generally depend on their family, or they work with a low amount of salary. Online materials are totally free of charge, or they can be found with a high level of searching, browsing, and decision-making skills, which is believed to enhance the practical skills of students. Moreover, online materials are nature friendly. People cut down a lot of trees for printed materials and books.
To conclude, it is undeniable that both sides have their own benefits. However, I still believe online materials are more beneficial in terms of high amounts of sources, price, and safety of nature.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rinted books outweigh online materials. Although I appreciate the advantageous aspects o...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52189781022 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87227204851 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602189781022 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4943049556 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5625 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285116908687 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895108656323 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648618860273 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153670760354 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759521718077 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.