There is a popular trend, nowadays, among the pupils who are passed out from the secondary education to volunteer in the humanitarian projects working in the developing country before they continue their tertiary schooling. There are both pros and cons for this current for the community as well as an individual. Following paragraphs will highlight these benefits and consequences.
On the one hand, there are some boons for this movement. Firstly, an under privileged area may get the skill set which would be unavailable otherwise which is very crucial for the development. Secondly, by living far from home they might confront with the situations which will get them the maturity and ability to stay alone with strangers. Finally, such selfless work is believed to be the means to increase the self-awareness and decrease the ego. Thus, apart from making the students sensitive to the local community, it serves as the mean to foster the cognizance.
On the other hand, there are some circumstances which may bring the curses with these blessings. The first point to make is that the expertise of the high-school passed person are not up to the mark which may deliver sub-standard work. Sometimes, they are not serious about the gravity of this philanthropy or may not pay attention and take it as just a way to weight their CV. Furthermore, if the agency by which they join the program does not provide proper knowledge of the customs and conventions, then a foreigner might accidently harm local sentiments. In addition to this, without any support volunteers may get frustrated and emotionally disturbed which may lead to deterioration of mental and physical health. Thus, if care is not taken, they may do something to the community instead of something for the community.
To conclude, increasing tendency to take a gap year for the volunteer work in the developing country brings new changes to improve the lifestyle of the masses and nurture the person towards the self-realization. But if a youngster is not sincere about the seriousness of the work, he may adversely affect not only the physical and mental health but also the culture of the nation.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'apart from', 'in addition', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209183673469 0.247107183377 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.145408163265 0.155533422707 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0637755102041 0.0946595960268 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0739795918367 0.0501214627716 148% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0280612244898 0.0437548338989 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112244897959 0.122226691241 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0255102040816 0.0403226058552 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88010161219 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0382653061224 0.0326793684256 117% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.145408163265 0.0861772015684 169% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0331632653061 0.021408717616 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0204081632653 0.011925033212 171% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2175.0 1933.35771543 112% => OK
No of words: 359.0 316.048096192 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05849582173 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33426183844 0.374742101984 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272980501393 0.28420135186 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.206128133705 0.203846283523 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.158774373259 0.137316102897 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88010161219 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.037074148 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565459610028 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 63.6093295644 60.7387585426 105% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4375 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1877960072 49.517814964 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.9375 127.492653851 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 0.814263465372 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 49.7355501393 49.1944974215 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.40206185567 1.69124875643 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33790064109 0.332605444948 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0997724682245 0.102741220458 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.052818303793 0.0668466124924 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.575975122985 0.534860350844 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152085578665 0.148594505496 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146350696867 0.134430193775 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647808693416 0.0742795772207 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.521157912675 0.324371583561 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0706064469263 0.0638462369009 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254844059879 0.228012699653 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261147677541 0.058150111329 45% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.