It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. Do you agree that this is the main cause of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation?
Nowadays, youth crime is rife. It is believed by many that media violence is basically responsible for the teenager offences. This essay is in agreement with the above-mentioned notion and this essay will discuss the solution which can be put forward to combat the situation.
To begin with, firstly, children become more aggressive. The movies watched by the youth are mostly violent where the hero is the vestige of violence, even though he gets rewarded by society. In short, they get influenced by their character and try to imitate in real-life which in turn makes them aggressive in nature. Secondly, video games such as “Grand Theft” have deteriorated the situation as teenagers become self-centered and more prone to crime like theft, burglary, and many more. For instance, research in the USA has suggested that 80% of juvenile crime committed by the people who regularly watch violent movies and play violent games.
Imprisonment is often cited as the best way to handle this problem. However, in my point of view children should be allowed to watch television under the supervision of the parents and parents should limit television to 1-2 hours daily. In this way, parents can limit the risk of exposure to violence and teach their offspring how to interpret what they have seen. Apart from this, regular counseling from the physician should be there for the children who had a hard time in the past. This will help in dampening the accelerating juvenile offence.
To conclude, the media plays a significant role in increasing the violence among the teenager by making them aggressive and self-center, however, parents can become game-changer by limiting the television time and arranging regular therapy from the doctors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, apart from, for instance, in short, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18374558304 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74531243692 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.953615212 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.785714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234985871175 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748591424708 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529256535312 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137050149175 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613569676854 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.