It is argued that dwelling in a nation needs to communicate in non-native vernacular may not only affect grave general issues but also pragmatic issues. Of course, there is possibility of detrimental impact among the community to which I think a proper understanding could be solution. In this essay, I shall emphasize both the views pertaining to its agreement and disagreement.
Firstly, some of the detrimental issues being unable to speak the language of the nation residing would impact with restriction and difficulty to express own view. This could bring a situation of misunderstanding with the domicile or native speaker. Secondly, although, the people can communicate non-verbally, however there are some social situations where one needs verbally be able to interact failing which could bring negativity. For this reason, at an instance of delivering duties miscalculating instructions could result negatively.
Though communication play a pivotal role in bringing the different cultures and people together, but it does not need to be just only by speaking. Likewise, one can know each other well with the behavior towards each other. To exemplify, the research team, Cambridge University of social communication and behavior, says that non-verbal communication accounts 93 percent, whereas verbal communication accounts only 7 percent. For an instance, a person reciprocating with a sneer would impact negatively, whereas person with smile would give a positive vibe.
In conclusion, the detriments due to inability communicating at social situations are over emphasized,but play a pivotal role while understanding significant instructions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning to its agreement and disagreement. Firstly, some of the detrimental issues ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...reement and disagreement. Firstly, some of the detrimental issues being unable to spea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...at social situations are over emphasized,but play a pivotal role while understanding...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, i think, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74089068826 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32416524547 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6079834864 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902735789049 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345391781326 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275099599448 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.050208787497 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353548946431 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.