Many animals are becoming extinct because of human activities. Why is this happening and what should be done to prevent this?
It is certainly true that wildlife population has increased dramatically over the past few decades. There are several reasons why this issue has arisen and various measures can be taken by humans to improve the situation. This essay will discuss the root causes of wild animal extinction and will suggest some solutions to prevent related problems from occurring.
The constant extinction of wildlife is caused by a number of factors. The main explanation is that poach is still existed and there is no full ban on it through the all countries. Not only is this dangerous for entire world ecosystem, but also it has a large impact on human being itself. Another reason why the situation has deteriorated is ever-growing amount of wastes produced by people. In addition, some types of wastes, especially plastic bags and bottles are cannot be recycled by nature anyway.
However the problem can be solved. The best way to reduce the level of illegal hunting would be to set the full ban on poaching and to implement the “zero-tolerance” policy on this subject. For instance, this policy was successfully used among Europe countries, and hence, saved European wild pigs from extinction. Likewise, reasonable regulations on wastes should become a compulsory requirement and crucial point of every country’s legal system to lower the impact wastes have on animals. It is imperative that strict punishment should be set for crimes against environment.
In conclusion, my opinion is that animals become extinct because of poaching and due to the poor policies on wastes. After analyzing the subject, it has become quite evident that the best approach to tackle the above-mentioned problems is to ban illegal hunting. At the same time, we need to improve insufficient waste management, especially in countries with weak legal system. Although the issue is unlikely to be entirely eliminated in short term, these are concrete steps which can be taken to reduce the effects they are having on animal life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...cannot be recycled by nature anyway. However the problem can be solved. The best way...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, hence, however, if, likewise, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20552147239 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9991734217 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3623849577 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268933609124 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727140676253 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578895037159 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155569216199 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366857308739 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.