In many countries, more money is spent on the transport system in the cities. In contrast, very little is spent in rural areas. what are the effects of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
Transport systems are evolving at an incredible pace to meet the demands of the surging population. Recent statistics show that the money spent on developing rural areas transport infrastructure is insignificant compared to cities; the effects of bias spending are discussed in this essay along with the solution.
Increasing population in the cities due to the employment generation has resulted in overcrowding of the commuting mode. Moreover, the development in the transport system is evident to evade the burden on the current options. The construction of the metro-system in Mumbai and neighbouring areas is fulfilling for the passengers to travel with convenience at a steady pace, without the hindrance of traffic, at affordable cost. Additionally, the revenue generated from these sources is considerable to recover the investment done for social upliftment.
However, the countryside transport development has been insignificant so far. Due to less population in rural areas, the authorities do not spend adequately on it. Nevertheless, industrialization in remote areas can benefit the local population for employment and also, the development of the transport system will be a necessity. To illustrate, the "MIDC" programme implemented in Maharashtra state has proven beneficial for the development of the state. Owing to this, improvement can be seen in rural areas also, furthermore, the tax generated favours the government for developing countryside and its commuting infrastructure.
To sum up, a better transport system is a necessity for the growth of society. Industrializing in the rural areas can generate employment for locals, thus more people will willingly stay at villages as an opportunity to earn bread at their hometown, so the transport system will automatically develop lucrative for both government and people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nvestment done for social upliftment However the countryside transport development h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...vernment for developing countryside and its commuting infrastructure To sum up a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57913669065 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38593168998 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 278.0 20.2975951904 1370% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1551.0 106.682146367 1454% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 278.0 20.7667163134 1339% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 75.0 7.06120827912 1062% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210183422817 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210183422817 0.084324248473 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138180017108 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642034593299 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 143.9 13.0946893788 1099% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -227.61 50.2224549098 -453% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 114.1 11.3001002004 1010% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.56 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.48 8.58950901804 262% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 9.78957915832 623% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 113.2 10.1190380762 1119% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 10.7795591182 566% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.