Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Internet undoubtedly has greatly influenced our world. Accessing social networking put negative impact on individual and society as a whole. I also agree with the same statement. Some impacts are inevitable and disaster.
For a start, individuals can spoil their career while entertaining themselves on internet websites. Social websites like Facebook, Instagram, Tweeter have variety of fun pages like games, video clips etc. People, especially, young adults spend most of their times on these websites. Ignoring the fact that at this age, they need to build their careers. They spoil it thoroughly and regret on it later in their lives. In addition to the above impact, confidentiality of ones live is greatly compromised. People take the videos of others in some embarrassing situations. They are not aware about the cruel intentions. When they see their clips going viral and people enjoying the video without knowing the consequences, they feel depression of being exposed to public about their personal lives which ultimately cause them committing suicides and other harmful things to them. Besides, few good things like building networking, social websites only create mess in individual lives.
Talking about the society, social websites have become responsible for the increasing cybercrimes. For example, most of the companies share their confidential information through networking websites to their employees such as pass codes, account numbers, phone numbers etc. These kinds of information are very much at risks during the interface period because hackers use such data for their negative purposes. Adding up further, extremists are very active on these websites. Using various methods, they build a group. They invite other people to watch their videos and then brainwashing them. These people then plan disaster attacks on the various places. Although, many governments like UK has decided imposing tax on websites like Facebook until unless they do something to combat the extremism.
To summarize, bringing people together and make work easier than every before, the negative repercussions of social networking are much stronger than the favorable points. Thus it is hoped that people would understand the impact of accessing social networking websites and refrain using them to a great extent
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...disaster attacks on the various places. Although, many governments like UK has decided i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...uch stronger than the favorable points. Thus it is hoped that people would understan...
^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and refrain using them to a great extent
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, talking about, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54647887324 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71289689476 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611267605634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2829162587 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0416666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7916666667 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165572569173 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471327670117 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539466609155 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126225171725 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050742184675 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.