Many people prefer to travel by car rather than buses or trains.
Why do you think this happens?
What can government do to motivate people travel by buses or trains?
It is true that countless people give priority to move by car rather than by buses or trains. In my opinion, hassle-free movement and social status can be the prime reasons for this situation and government could control this situation by offering different kinds of facilities.
Citizens of many countries prefer to have a car as a mode of transportation. Primarily, having a personal vehicle makes the movement very comfortable as the user does not need to wait for others. I think this type of opportunity ensures stress-free travel as well. In a medical emergency, for example, the person who has a private a car, he would be able to go to the hospital quickly than others. Furthermore, a car has a brand value to uphold the social status of its owner. So the advantages of traveling by a car cannot be denied.
The government of a country has many options to encourage its citizens to use public transport. The privilege of having an income tax reduction could be a better option. If a person moves by bus or train, he will get some concession at the time of submitting yearly income tax. Moreover, the introduction of family transportation card may be an effective way to inspire the general people. The owner of this card will have the opportunity to move at a cheap rate along with his family members. Finally, the offer of comfortable local transportation can minimize the usage of private cars.
In conclusion, although many people are interested to use cars instead of buses or trains, I think, comfort and social position are the major reasons for it. If the government can introduce privileges like income tax reduction or family transportation card system, the situation will be different.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89347079038 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94160885749 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2353703718 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224343989344 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736376139898 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763044570853 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148260731765 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636593791351 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.