Many people prefer to travel by car rather than buses or trains.
Why do you think this happens?
What can government do to motivate people travel by buses or trains?
Countless number of individuals feel comfortable to move here and there by cars instead of public modes of transportation. In my opinion, reliability and comfort are the main reasons for using private automobiles. The government could ensure the availability of buses and trains to encourage people to use it.
The key reasons to use personal vehicle is that it is more reliable and more comfortable than any other options of transport. Citizens of many countries generally face a lot of problems to have a reliable civic transportation. In the developing countries like India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, it is so difficult to get on the communal bus in the office hours. Not only are the buses full of people but also trains are crowded as well. I feel that considering these situations a solvent person never wants to use buses and trains. Instead, they will prefer to have a car, as it will help them to reach in their respective destination in time comfortably. Above all, there are many possible reasons to own a car.
The government of a country can play a significant role to draw attention of the mass people to use community transportation by ensuring the sufficient number of buses and trains in the peak hours. In the morning, for example, when the majority of people travel for work, the government might identify the major destinations of these commuters and according to that it can increase the number of buses and trains bound to those places. In addition, the authority can announce yearly income tax fee rebate for the users. So I think mentioned steps could be taken by government to create interest among people to use bus and train.
In conclusion, although I think that wealthy and solvent people are very keen to have a personal mobility for dependability and luxury, the government would be able to change the scenario by taking initiatives like income tax discount and guaranteed availability of public transportations in the rush hours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraging'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: encouraging
...re the availability of buses and trains to encourage people to use it. The key reasons to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94816560606 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1580642233 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257935919703 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834377452367 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698115842123 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143621837123 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630847569788 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.