Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this changed improved the way people live?
Advanced technologies can indeed help us save a lot of time and energy on cooking. Some people argue that this development has not improved our standard living at all. Personally speaking, I agree with this point of view.
Undoubtedly, the development of this trend has its disadvantages. One of the most obvious phenomena is that easier preparation of food lead to more unhealthy food eating habit. Nowadays, people can use an oven or microwave to cook frozen food which they brought from a convenient store in five minutes. Even though they can save a lot of time cooking, most of the frozen food contain huge amount of fat and calorie which are extremely bad for our health. Meanwhile, low production cost for food also create tones of fast-food restaurants flourished in the city. These force people to adapt to an unhealthy diet.
Nevertheless, advanced technologies indeed have improved our living standard tremendously. With time has been saved by the technologies on cooking, people can have more time pursuing other things. For instance, in the past, women have to spend the entire day in the kitchen to prepare a decent meal for their family. However, women live in modern society can pursuing a career opportunity without neglect the duty of being a good nurturer.
Furthermore, the adoption of modern techniques of cooking allows us to cook various types of cuisine. For instance, in the past, people have to travel for long distance to have a taste of other countries' cuisine. Today, we can simply watch different types of cooking tutorial video and thy to cook them in our kitchen without step out of the door. This surely gave us a huge improvement in the richness of our life.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that changes to the way we prepare our meals have had a positive effect on the way we live our lives. This is because it offers women more opportunities in the workplace and gave us more freedom to cooking different dishes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... long distance to have a taste of other countries cuisine. Today, we can simply watch dif...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92192192192 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71271751456 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0176042799 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2631578947 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216338546884 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665279780961 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568974522464 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119430514102 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438872298754 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.