Nowadays people buy a lot of unnecessary manufactured products. Is it a positive or negative development? What is the effect of this on the individual and the society?
At present, people live in a sophisticated and dependent to the electronic gadgets in Global wide. Many companies launched numerous electronic or non electronic instruments for societies for more convenient life. Sometimes this products were neither necessary nor unnecessary. So that production of non-useful device provide negative impacts to society.
On the one hand, some n needed products such as continue production of old design gadgets or electronic machines such as radio, land phones etc. have been wasted the health as well as wealth of each member of the society. Because, newly intended electronic machines have many options. Hence the people likes to use new machines with all other specialties. For instance, Since a lot of changes happened during the way of smartphones from the simple mobile or land lines. Nowadays, smart phones use for internet assess and video calling for communications, while, old accessories used only for verbal communications. So that merchandising of land phones and related gadgets were effects negatively to the society.
Secondly, wastage of unneccery electronic gadgets made pollution in a Global wide. Because each electronic item will not dissolve in earth more over it may chances to produce many ultraviolet rays which is affected human health enormously.
In my point of view, the unused gadgets give more disadvantages rather than advantages to the society or individual through the way they used.
To conclude, the over use of unnecessary gadgets will be lost wealth as well as health also.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ies for more convenient life. Sometimes this products were neither necessary nor unn...
^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...were neither necessary nor unnecessary. So that production of non-useful device provide...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s wealth of each member of the society. Because, newly intended electronic machines hav...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... electronic machines have many options. Hence the people likes to use new machines wi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...adgets made pollution in a Global wide. Because each electronic item will not dissolve ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s will be lost wealth as well as health also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37860082305 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93619596777 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625514403292 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9132118465 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0847623171263 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029674509859 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276621012712 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466170741788 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271637005794 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.