Nowadays people use different machines and devices to do housework. Do you see it continuing as a trend? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
Technology has spread throughout the world. It is not only limited to the industry, but is also wide used in household chores from minor to major tasks because of its continuing trend. There are so many pros and cons of this increasing way of life.
Firstly, the devices are more convenient for people doing housework. Many electronic devices like washing machine, microwave, vacuum cleaner etc. has made the job work of women so easy. Such machines are also equally suitable for the elder lady as well as handicap person. Secondly, these electronic devices are designed to save time and make people more efficient. Those who do not have time, like mother doing chores, can now focus on their children. Also, the household ladies can get the opportunity to get employment. Finally, these machines are faster and accurate. Using these, we can do the task much earlier as comparison to yesteryear. For example, in the past, it took ample time of mother to wash the clothes by hand, but with the help of washing machine, now it takes less than an hour and also save the energy of her.
Though they have their advantages, appliances are not without their drawbacks. Therefore, the first downside is that it makes us lazy. All the activities which required energy and burn calories are presently doing by these autonomous devices, which make us slacker. Secondly, the costs of these are also very high. It costs money to buy appliances, but also to operate them. Not all families have money to buy these things. Lastly, a commonly overlooked of negative side of electronic gadgetry is their environmental impact. Non-biodegradable, non-recyclable electronic gadgets often end up in landfills or are shipped to crude facilities in developing countries. Without safe and efficient means of recycling, electronic wastes are burned to salvage bits of metal – releasing toxic substances into the atmosphere, polluting the immediate environment and potentially nearby water resources as well.
At last but not least, barring its cons, it can be conclude that these machine made devices are boon to the modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... these, we can do the task much earlier as comparison to yesteryear. For example,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11527377522 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74693439694 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613832853026 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7919641116 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1739130435 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0869565217 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04347826087 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163124291911 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426406817028 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621800536969 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884067140343 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568165760097 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.