Nowadays everything is run by technological gadgets. People use it everywhere in their day to day life. Authorities and law enforcement are taking a good use of this development, mainly for security purposes. With the advent of technological improvements countries, are finding it difficult to protect their borders and people from possible threats. As result they are using many surveillance facilities like spy cams, audio records to retrieve pieces of information for safety purpose without noticing others. There are many advantages for this kind of practice.
To begin with, in today's world no one is safe in any part of the earth. There are always been under the danger posed by the humans its self. So by tracking each every person's communications and movements, the cops can identify whether they are posing any harm to the society. If someone is found to be a possible outlaw they can immediately detain him even before committing anything wrong. Furthermore, many countries are using this same technique in their borders also, to protect their country from any invaders. Its military applications are beyond our expectations. Moreover, multinational companies are also using these surveillance facilities to protect their confidential documents leaking out of their premises.
On the other hand, there are some ethical problems while authorities do this. Mainly it's about each person's privacy, they are totally unaware that they are being monitored around the clock by others. Whatever they speak will eventually end up in totally irrelevant individuals hand even if those are purely their personal business. What is more, there is also a chance of misuse of this information from authorities side. People, those who have access to this kind of information might use the same for blackmailing others or taking other advantages from concerned persons.
To recapitulate, all the technological developments made by the humans so far has both negative and positive effects. Authorities should keep a sharp eye to reduce these negative impacts, in doing so they may break some ethical points but at the end of the day, people are being benefitted out of it. So, it has been clear that the advantages of these acts are clearly outweighing its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...blems while authorities do this. Mainly its about each persons privacy, they are to...
^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...horities do this. Mainly its about each persons privacy, they are totally unaware that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, kind of, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27348066298 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93770081492 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582872928177 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6665493782 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9047619048 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194208400937 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531979212849 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407603414172 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113194848112 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508037689642 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.