Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed
because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types
of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative
development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from
your own knowledge or experience.
In the present era, conversation between individuals has dramatically changed with the advent of the sophisticated technology. I concur with the given assertion and believe that it is an intrinsic achievement of the mankind. This essay shall delineate the fundamental factors such as strong relationships and globalization, which are propitious for everyone.
To begin with, people are connected with each other all the time with the help of smartphones and the internet. A cellphone has faciliated a person to call others and know about imperative information or staying updated with their lives. Moreover, individuals could make friends online and confabulate with their loved ones through video call and chatting, which help to stay in touch with one another. For instance, striplings immigrate to foreign nations for higher studies as well as jobs and are able to converse with their parents by several social applications, which helps to maintain their bonds and sojourn aware about their lives.
Furthermore, technology has paved the way for globalization as communication and trading have become feasible. Local organizations are able to interact with international firms by conference calls and emails to make indispensable deals. In addition, enormous business transactions are feasible by various abroad payment portals, which create opportunities for citizens and also aid countries economically. To illustrate, several ventures operate their call centres in other territories where labour rate is less, which benefits them in saving money and offers new opportunities for other countries.
In conclusion, inauguration of technology has enormous advantages especially the method people socialize with one another, which assists to make friends and strengthens their connections with their households as well as helps to proliferate networks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77090909091 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15568488722 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625454545455 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1124262073 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201197184845 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771907729952 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510180743317 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119692004306 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187130508861 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.