Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development.
Technology has brought a tremendous change in the way people converse with each other. Internet has brought the world closer, and significant ways are developed to engage with people anywhere on earth. Undoubtedly, the social networking websites have benefited as per one's usages, and positive outcomes are evident from it.
Firstly, the social platforms available on internet are defined for its purpose. For example, Facebook for making friends, Instagram for posting photos or videos, LinkedIn for professional or business usages, and many more platforms are available. The user depending upon the concern and outcome required can create a profile and connect with people instantly. Sometimes the bonding made over internet are task oriented, and in other times they last for decades into long-lasting relationship. Thus, personel intentions signifies the outcome generated from the bonding made on social websites.
In most cases the people have benefited from the connections made on the internet. To illustrate, back then applicant use to send their resume's through mail or post which use to get lost with other applications, but now one can send the invitation to the person in human resource department on networking portals and also get a quick feedback about the results. Moreover, while travelling or moving abroad, connecting with locals can reduce the distressing about the new place, and can also assist us in many ways possible. Owing to this, the positive developments can be seen in such situations which has benefited towards globalisation.
Development in technology has helped the generation to grow and adapt quickly, conversely, it is getting safer and secured with the upcoming developments and protocols integrated by the government and authorizing bodies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...net. To illustrate, back then applicant use to send their resumes through mail or p...
^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...heir resumes through mail or post which use to get lost with other applications, bu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for example, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47931034483 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9157022923 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4788716767 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.230769231 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239820143177 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091125157615 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111767334461 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156618978578 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100918357103 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.