Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nobody can dispute the fact that due to modernization and westernization the trash around us has increased substantially. The primary reason is the inclusive rise in consumption pattern of individuals. However, the volume of trash can be decreased if authorities would implement some rules regarding disposal of items properly.
Apparently, people are nowadays extremely interested in buying more things such as gadgets, eatables and durable goods. These items comes in a very attractive packing which is thrown away once the article is opened consequently the amount of trash drastically increases around individuals. For example, when people buy some food from supermarkets which is packed well but then to carry it to home it again requires one more layer of packing and later on all the unpacked material is thrown away resulting in mammoth rise of rubbish.
Nevertheless, government can frame policies and norms regarding the management of waste which can helps in lessening the trash around the people. Despite awareness campaigns if people are bound in rules it will act as a key influencing factor in making them cautious about keeping their surroundings clean. It will be not only a good habit for them but also this can improves a nations environment. For example, In USA, domestic trash is banned to be thrown in bins as people are directed to burn it so as to reduce its amount.
In conclusion, eventhough the trend of consumerism has grown considerably the waste should be managed well which is beneficial for society. While, executives can control this phenomenon by making strict laws. Henceforth, the atmosphere of a country will be better and a good place to for dwelling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding trash'?
Suggestion: the surrounding trash
...due to modernization and westernization the trash around us has increased substantially. The primar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'items'' or 'item's'?
Suggestion: items'; item's
...gets, eatables and durable goods. These items comes in a very attractive packing whic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...eatables and durable goods. These items comes in a very attractive packing which is t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...rding the management of waste which can helps in lessening the trash around the peopl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'improve'
Suggestion: improve
...a good habit for them but also this can improves a nations environment. For example, In ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...t for them but also this can improves a nations environment. For example, In USA, domes...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... bins as people are directed to burn it so as to reduce its amount. In conclusion, ev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d well which is beneficial for society. While, executives can control this phenomenon...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17818181818 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95297804578 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607272727273 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0387134692 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124926350299 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422225860402 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267220807349 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686698230606 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240153558818 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.