Teachers beyond all doubt play a great role in forming children's character and vital one in building their knowledge while parents try to bring them up to be more well-bred. I do not agree that only teachers are the only ones who effect pupils' intellectual and social development but their parents as well who are not less influencial than the former one. In this essay I will write about both's influenc on this matter and try to back with examples.
Firstly, teachers are those who give education to pupils at school. Pupils acquire necessary information by their teachers. This enables for their educational aims, that is of getting knowlege in the process of studying.
Secondly, school are not the only place where pupils are given knowledge but get to know the life. Pupils surely are more effected by teacher due to their being in school. There at school teachers are becoming their so to say second moms and dads who can help them if they have some problems. For instance, educators can solve problems related to corelations with classmates and so on. Moreover, at school more than somewhere else children learn how to behave at some social situation when communicating with their mates and when they have difficulty in tackling issues teachers come to their help who give besides knowledge but life advices which can in future be very beneficial.
Looking at the other side of the argument, parents mostly infuence their kids due to having more time with each other than when in school. It is commonly known that every pupil is individual which means they have differing scope of knowledge and bring-up. This is because parents are answerable first of all in their kids' behavior.
In conclusion, children's intellectual and social foundation is based on both teachers' and parents impact. The question is who spares more of their time with kids. If this time is filled with positive content so kids will grow up balanced with advantageous bringing up and knowledge.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93393393393 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5334384149 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543543543544 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0278873078 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6470588235 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252979370136 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847146710752 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632991782103 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140476324152 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442970702639 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.