The only reason people work hard is to earn more money. There are no other reasons to do it. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
To begin, a lot of people think so hurd work it is the way to have some income and nothing else. I am partly agree with it. let us discuss this problem.
Firstly, in my opinion all the people who work, have some reasons for that. Anyway, earning of money is one from some goals to work hurd. For instance, most of us want to have high standard of life and we need to have money for that the morer the better that is common thing. Also we should to pay for lots of things which are doing our life possible. Among these, several needs are the same for each one,for example food, clothes, entertainment, housing coast some money that we usually getting by work.
However, as it was mention, hurd work is not only the way to get money. In my understanding is two basic examples when true hurd work means something else. At first we all know who is volunteers. I am sure that these people are doing a lot of work around the world absolutely for free. Very often their work is so hurd and danger. Instead of money they work for own idea to help to other people or for our future. The second example is about Japanese people. Hurd work is almost tradition for them. In their society exist some rules about job. To work no less then 16 hours per day means normaly and respectly. Also most of them do not take vacation during decades to have respect from employers. I think that all these points about Japanese is not quite easy way to work but they do it so not only to earn money.
In conclusion, I want to say that hurd work actually brings us money but income is not only the reason to do it so because different people have different values and needs
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...me income and nothing else. I am partly agree with it. let us discuss this problem. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have money for that the morer the better that is common thing. Also we should to ...
^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...morer the better that is common thing. Also we should to pay for lots of things whi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , for
... several needs are the same for each one,for example food, clothes, entertainment, h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inment, housing coast some money that we usually getting by work. However, as ...
^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...t some rules about job. To work no less then 16 hours per day means normaly and resp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rs per day means normaly and respectly. Also most of them do not take vacation durin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, anyway, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.29073482428 5.12529762239 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12174253457 2.80592935109 76% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533546325879 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.071943643 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.9523809524 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.9047619048 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25245522352 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764016543639 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615705329054 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16331102668 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519338317358 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.2 13.0946893788 47% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 50.2224549098 165% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 11.3001002004 46% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.01 12.4159519038 56% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.58950901804 79% => Dale chall readability score is low.
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.