The ownership of cars should be one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, humans' overreliance on car usage is arguably the main cause of traffic congestion and the degradation of air quality. However, it is argued that to reverse the situation, each family should only own one private vehicle. I agree with this opinion in some ways. The following paragraphs will discuss the opinion and my perception.
It is reasonable to believe that the restriction on the number of cars owned by each family plays a significant role in mitigating the problems of air pollution and traffic jams. First of all, the limitation contributes to reducing the number of running cars on the road, and a growing number of citizens are encouraged to take public transports to the destination. Therefore, the total amount of car exhaust will drastically decline. Besides, this restriction is able to increase the popularity of cycling, and more citizens will develop a tendency to bike to the destination, which is also consistent with the universal principle of promoting environmental-friendly transport modes.
On the other hand, some people believe that the limitation will also bring about a series of issues. In the first place, it posts various inconveniences on most residents. For instance, many people who live in rural area or countryside will find it difficult to reach their workplaces or schools, as the public transport system in many cities is poor and incapable of meeting the needs of citizens. As a consequence, those people will spend an excessive amount of time merely on commuting. Additionally, the vast majority of families includes more than 4 members. Therefore, it is impossible to utilize only one vehicle to carry them.
In my opinion, it is worth mentioning that the limitation on the ownership of private vehicle per family could minimize people's reliance on car use, thereby enhancing traffic and easing the problem of pollution. Overall, I believe that it is an appropriate approach. However, we should also concern about the inconveniences caused by this control.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
1. The words are not used so efficiently
unique words percentage: 0.556574923547 0.561755894193 99%
it is lower than the average 0.561755894193
2. some subjects of sentences are duplicated, for example, in the third paragraph:
some people believe that the limitation will also bring about a series of issues. In the first place, it posts various inconveniences on most residents. For instance,
many people who live in rural area or countryside will find it difficult to reach their workplaces or schools, as the public transport system in many cities is poor and incapable of meeting the needs of citizens. As a consequence,
those people will spend an excessive amount of time merely on commuting. Additionally,
the vast majority of families includes more than 4 members. Therefore, it is impossible to utilize only one vehicle to carry them.
they share the same subjects 'people'
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 327 350
No. of Characters: 1655 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.252 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.061 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.988 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.235 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.424 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.279 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.478 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.052 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, first of all, in my opinion, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21406727829 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07918422511 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556574923547 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.583520668 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159932470399 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443389856995 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490989707645 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102132154291 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526144332237 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.