In the technology era, students nowadays can access to a wide source of knowledge on the Internet. Therefore, there is a debate that teachers who were the main source of information are being replaced in universities and schools in this information age. This essay will argue why the role of teachers in learning will never be replaced in modern education.
On the one hand, the young generation having access to vast information will reduce the importance of teachers in schools. Students easily get the lessons content as well as the curriculum instead of waiting for the content delivery from teachers. For example, the lessons and the curriculum which are digitalized and published on the local school network will be downloaded by students to study at home prior to going to class. This example has supported the existing idea that teachers are not necessary for classes in this information age.
Despite lessons published online and students can access from home, however, the idea that teachers are unnecessary is completely preposterous. Most of the students will find it difficult to understand the lesson without directions from teachers. In addition, the reliability of the information on the Internet is questionable because there is no one to verify such information. If students apply the knowledge hastily, there will have a dangerous situation. For instance, in chemistry, students who mix substances with the wrong formula will lead to dangerous kinds of stuff like poisons. From this instance, teachers who will still play an important role in schools will give the right direction to students.
This essay argued why teachers are still an important element in this modern education. In my opinion, I totally agree with the idea that teachers are directions for students, so they will have a solid position in the schools in any kind model of education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17434210526 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81930540146 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.908899417 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.866666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204543865823 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761013446457 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588380358333 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146827491027 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531909300449 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.