people now a days work hard to buy more things. This has made our life generally more comfortable but it is a pity many traditional values have been lost on the way to such materialism. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Many people are tended towards materialistic lives. They are more satisfied with this material world where they can have anything to ease them but they do not realize that such activities are dropping them far behind from their heart relations. I am very much on the side of those people who believe that this part is gradually losing its grip of their traditions and customs.
To have more comfortable lifestyle you need more money to earn. This modern era is providing immense opportunities to individual to become successful in their lives. There are plenty of options such as multinational companies, joint ventures or commencing sole business. All you need to do is work regardless of your health or time duration. It is very much fact that your sweat and faith will pay you off in terms of financial strength.
However, for earning more money people are staying away from their home. Globalization has really speeded up the working of humans. Many opportunities have been explored by many people which is on one side is favorable as they would have more net worth than ever before but it should not be forgotten that this life has only a temporary phase and cannot be last long. On the other side, the traditional faith is one which remains with you throughout your life. Some people do realize that and when they try to make it up, it is already too late for them. They all remain with regrets and pain.
To conclude, it is true that moral values have been jeopardized over the materialistic needs. Therefore, it is very necessary to keep the balance in both. Otherwise, no relation would keep its importance over feelings but on monetary values only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...you off in terms of financial strength. However, for earning more money people a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...s favorable as they would have more net worth than ever before but it should not be f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, therefore, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8118466899 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57488695984 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7358532397 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2352941176 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275828382679 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756378718224 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557815180767 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151907310152 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550133545349 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.