It is true that how the authorities and citizens inject money is a controversial issue. While I accept that they are wasting money to national anniversaries. I believe that their investment are reasonable.
On the one hand, I agree that investing in special days or festivals are plentiful. Firstly, irrelevant the state funds allocation are making budget deficit. For example, the Vietnamese budget deficit has been constantly approximate five percents in recent years. Secondly, people spend a lot of money to prepare for on national holidays such as Tet holiday. Having about 10 days off for all people on Tet holiday, they invest in house decoration or traveling plans without working, so that it is a waste of time as well as money.
On the other hand, I believe that their injecting money into those events is absolutely relevant. Being organised by a prestigious organisation like the state, commemoration days will not only help citizens remember the fallen sodiers, but also create a chance for the public pay tribute to the people who have contributed to the nation. For instance, The Vietnamese Teacher’s day is the speacial banquet around the country that help students to grateful their teachers. Furthermore, my opinion is that important holidays will be a precious oppoturnity for family members to worship ancestors, entertaining together. Consequently, people could show their respects for previous generations, there by warming up family bond.
In conclusion, although there are many arguments in favor of declining investment in national events, I believe that injecting money into them is suitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... inject money is a controversial issue. While I accept that they are wasting money to...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'funds'' or 'fund's'?
Suggestion: funds'; fund's
...lentiful. Firstly, irrelevant the state funds allocation are making budget deficit. F...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33852140078 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00240885995 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630350194553 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3826689328 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2142857143 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146291390474 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526546056493 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475435484314 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990108939384 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244282679631 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.