Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Medical science is improving at a higher rate in recent times. Advancement in science and technology expands the lifespan of people up to 100 or 200 years. A few people consider this as a good sign for the future of human beings while some other people argue this would be against to nature. This essay will argue both views.
People could be benefited in different ways if they could live up to 100 years or more. For example, they could spend time with the next two or three generations and pass their experience and moral values to them. It would help younger generations to learn a lot about family values as well as life experience. In addition to that, people get enough time to reach their goals and get some time to spend with their families. The cumulative knowledge and experience of the people would help in a positive way to develop the nation as there will be huge manpower available.
On the other hand, some drawbacks can be identified in the idea of expanding the life expectancy of people. If lifespan is expanded the number of old people would be increased in the future and they have to be provided with good medical care. The rate of spreading disease would increase and it could create a need for medical advancement further. All these will lead to a need of huge amount of money to spend on science and medical research and development. Furthermore, it would increase the unemployment rate among younger generations as youngsters would not get the chance to get the jobs since older people are still there.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea of extending the human life expectancy up to 100 years or more as it would increase the unemployment rate among youngsters and spread disease among people. All of these lead to unnecessary increase in the cost of the country which could be spent in the country’s development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and experience of the people would help in a positive way to develop the nation as there will be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...life expectancy up to 100 years or more as it would increase the unemployment rate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75692307692 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62906107388 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464615384615 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8562555292 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170723146669 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656268074561 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685392223742 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121190038694 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106523262015 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.