Scientist predicts that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future Do you think this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Scientist predicts that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future. Do you think this a positive or negative development?

Some language experts predict that in the coming year people will speak one come language. In my opinion, it is going to be a positive development. This will provide more business opportunities to people worldwide, and also assist in science and technology it will serve as a tool for human progress.

To begin with, the omnipresence of a single language will be like a short in the arm for businesses around the globe as it will eventually end the language barrier. This will facilitate businessmen to explore the hidden markets, which were earlier not accessible, to sell their products in distant markets such as Africa, Europe with the help of common language. For instance, the European government has adopted English as the common language for all the residents. As a result, the gross domestic product of the countries has observed exponential growth. Therefore, if the countries need to progress economically in the future, they will adopt a common language for further communications.

Furthermore, the adaptation of single language around the world will give a fruitful result in the science and technology field as scientists of different countries will be able to interact with each other, allowing them to share their ideas and experience, and creating a path for future innovations. Additionally, they can take the help of the stored knowledge will be earlier not accessible because of language hurdles. Hence, the acceptance of a common language will lead to inevitable scientific progress.
To conclude, a common medium of interaction will allow the corporations to communicate and trade globally, and providing easy access to scientific data, will ensure continuous human progress in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99756371711 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1018432919 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203333191736 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783506185049 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377503793416 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127144814215 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498899168008 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.