In some countries the governments pay the unemployed people on a weekly basis How would this impact people as well as government Do you agree or disagree with that

Essay topics:

In some countries, the governments pay the unemployed people on a weekly basis. How would this impact people as well as government? Do you agree or disagree with that?

In the present scenario, it is quite mundane that few countries are paying their unemployed citizens every week. However, this shows a negative impact on the people of the country. In further paragraphs, I shall put my arguments to support my opinion.

First and foremost, the government of any state would fall into debt if they support their people without taking work from them. Sitting ideal at home would result in becoming lethargic and more prone to diseases. If the skilled class workers would not earn, they may forget their skills which they had learned from so many years ending in disguise.

On the other hand, the fault lies in the government who does not provide the jobs to the well-educated section. Its the duty of the country to support its citizens where they are unable to provide jobs according to their qualifications. For instance, in the pandemic, it’s the responsibility of the government to assist in every household as the people have become unemployed. Therefore, the nation needs to stand for its countrymen.

In conclusion, the people could be saved from crises if the government provides them with the basic amenities during any pandemic or where the regime is unable to provide them with work. But, this should not be the common scenario as it would make the economy of the nation poor with unproductive citizens.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... the jobs to the well-educated section. Its the duty of the country to support its ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97797356828 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63467798252 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607929515419 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3493477859 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255084797962 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837729120189 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621245711945 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142166754024 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306024862938 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.