In some countries, people are purchasing fewer new items and more second hand goods. What are the reasons and is this a positive and negative trend?
Indubitably, globalization has lead to paradigm shift n purchasing power of people. In this contemporary era, individuals are extremely interested to buy second hand things instead of brand new. Apparently, there are prominent reasons that significantly contribute to this phenomenon. However, I find this trend constructive.
Fundamentally, the predominant factors that evidently trigger it can be observed. First and foremost, an exponential rise in global inflation have substantially contributed t prolific increase in prices of products resultantly people lacks the affordability to buy any new item. Seemingly, high prices have lead to lower consumption of brand new products. Secondly, a second hand item efficiently fulfills the need of customers within the budget of a person. Although some issues can be faced in a used product, in terms of money it act as a key influencing factor to save one's hard earned money. According to BBC, a recent study revealed that 60% of people vehemently deems that used products are cheaper and saves their money. Thirdly, Is buying a used product a positive trend? Certainly Yes! In this modern epoch, needs of people are highly dynamic. Investing a chunk of money on a product just for a short period of time can lead to dismal consequences of financial burden.
Nevertheless, in my contention, it is an applauding trend for myriad reasons. Chiefly, despite affluent people who can buy new things, second hand things cater the needs of them who are incapable of purchasing new things. Consequently, it will inclusively contribute to status equality in terms of things among the society. Moreover, money is of paramount significance in this modern era. If people can save their residual income by buying cheaper products it can lead to prolific increase in their savings resulting in sound financial management. To corroborate, children who purchase second hand books have cleverly eradicated the burden of expenses on their parents. In addition to this, people can reap the benefits of high quality things. Even though, many other chief quality products are available, branded products even if used are considered more reliable and durable.
Suffice to say, the world has witnessed several revolutionary changes being the inclination of people towards used thing the most prominent. The probable causes of this universal phenomenon are low income levels and higher cost but it proves to be favourable as it saves money and promotes status equality among people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'acts'?
Suggestion: acts
...in a used product, in terms of money it act as a key influencing factor to save one...
^^^
Line 3, column 912, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... of money on a product just for a short period of time can lead to dismal consequences of fina...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...amount significance in this modern era. If people can save their residual income b...
^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun revolutionary seems to be countable; consider using: 'several revolutionaries'.
Suggestion: several revolutionaries
...Suffice to say, the world has witnessed several revolutionary changes being the inclination of people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36111111111 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98577020926 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5250632361 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3043478261 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2173913043 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230298423232 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660591186025 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494775231193 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143449638547 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650802353826 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.