The majority of countries have already prohibited smoking tobacco in public places including offices and restaurants. However, the passing laws against smoking is a conroversial tactic which appears to have a numer of contradictore effects and therefore the remaining countries do not aspire to do this. We will consider both sides of the discussion in this essay.
On the one hand, supporters promote the idea that prohibition will lead to lower consumption and thus lower risks of dangerous diseases such as cancer and stroke reusltin from addiction. They point to evident from countries including Singapore where this appears to be the case, and urge other nations to follow suit. Furthermore, proponents claim that consuming excessive amount of tobacco has a detrimental effect on people's health leading to inadequate development of their lungs and brains.
However, opponents are able to cite evidence from other countries such as Bulgaria and Italy where smoking at the restaurants is legal in spite of the fact that high taxes have been imposed by the governments. In these countries, the effect has been to force people to pay more taxes for smoking although it has not prohibited tobacco at all. Moreover, critics of ban highlight the difficulty of relaxation without smoking, which may assist to cheer up afrer work, while having dinner.
In conclusion, it woulde be advisable to reduce the level of smokers by passing speacial laws. It seems to be reasonable to impose such laws which may contribute to well lessen the risks of diseases and addiction among people. It would be better to urge as many counties as possible to follow this notion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut smoking, which may assist to cheer up afrer work, while having dinner. In c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16296296296 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74618078726 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9958962733 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305294487409 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103961043035 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090104521312 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180162982667 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147593043024 0.056905535591 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.