Overpopulation is a major issue in some under-developed and developing countries. Because of extra population government can't ensure basic needs for its citizens. This is the reason why most of the governments create a policy to restrict the population boom. I agree with the concept of birth control because it would be beneficial for current and future generations of the country.
Manpower is the best resource a country could have but overpopulation has a lot of detrimental effect for the economy and the society. With the increasing population, the government has to build new infrastructure, create new jobs and other facilities continuously for its citizens. This requires a considerable amount of budget which is in most cases become impossible for the nation. As a result, the lifestyle of the people of the country goes below the standard. In some under-developed countries, it went too worse that even food and shelter is unavailable. These are the outcome of overpopulation and hence the government tries to control the population.
It has been seen as the birth control policy by several countries in the last century. China imposed "One child policy" since 1969 and it existed for almost three decades and they got its benefit without any doubt. China, in recent years, going ahead in all aspect, in terms of economy, technology, exports. Switzerland also applied a few regulations for the family having more than 2 children. It was like those family who had more than 2 children can't buy additional lands. Switzerland also got its benefit and now it's a country with a higher range of per capita income.
In conclusion, according to the facts and examples I have given clearly birth control holds a huge benefit for a nation and government could control the number of children by introducing birth-control policies or any other types of taxes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... Because of extra population government cant ensure basic needs for its citizens. Th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this family' or 'those families'?
Suggestion: this family; those families
...aving more than 2 children. It was like those family who had more than 2 children cant buy a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ose family who had more than 2 children cant buy additional lands. Switzerland also ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...witzerland also got its benefit and now its a country with a higher range of per ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, as to, in conclusion, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14379084967 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05240654203 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4226180505 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5882352941 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276132337149 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774510777825 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606755820349 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172045909877 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492496941173 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.