Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern world, where every content could be found from TV channels such as entertainment or education. There is a school of thought about encouraging children to watch TV both at home and at school because they think that youngsters can be more beneficial from watching TV. While I accept this to some extent, I do not think children should watch TV regularly.
On the one hand, there is no denial that children could learn numerous things from TV channels. Nowadays educational organizations tend to introduce their courses online channels that children will learn. For example, amazing English content published by the BBC channel is valuable for English learners in over the world. Because of useful information, parents can allow their children to learn this by watching TV.
On the other hand, besides useful information broadcasted, TV channels also contain potentially harmful contents, so parents should be careful while allowing to watch TV at home or at school. Online stations now are flooded in crime news or sexual information that is broadcasted to attract more people. Consequently, children can catch those negative contents and they tend to follow behaviors from the video they have seen. Therefore, adults who are responsible to take care of children have to set restrictions on TV channels and contents itself. This is to ensure harmful information will not be displayed to the children.
In conclusion, while children can obtain knowledge from watching TV, I believe parents should set limitations and restrictions on watching TV. It will help to avoid harmful information, which will potentially bring a negative impact on their development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'watching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: watching
...arents should be careful while allowing to watch TV at home or at school. Online station...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29588014981 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87776965108 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546816479401 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3137505002 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434099041373 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152179380165 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147437207827 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281854876269 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125212820438 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.