Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been argued that community volunteer work should be a requirement in secondary school curriculums. Although this concept has some benefits, I am of the opinion that it is not a realistic option.
It is true that compulsory volunteer work would have some advantages. First of all, requiring young people to become more active members of their community at a young age would help them learn how the less fortunate in their local area live. If young people can work as part of a charity or interact with the poorer members of their community, they will develop empathy for those who are less fortunate. Secondly, working outside the school would teach them practical skills that would be of use in adult life. The reality is most subjects that are taught in school are never needed after graduation. In contrast, community service is an education that is relevant for the long term.
However, there are practical reasons why community service is unworkable. Firstly, it is likely that there would not be enough useful jobs for the young people to do. There is a limited number of volunteers that any charity, neighbourhood or sporting group needs, so the supply of volunteers would be too great. In addition, the behaviour of many high school students would undoubtedly be a problem. There are nightmare students in every class and to force them upon community organisations and charities would be a recipe for disaster.
In conclusion, while there are some commendable aspects associated with the idea of mandatory community service for high school students, I believe that in the real world this program is unworkable and not based in reality. collected
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Collected
...is unworkable and not based in reality. collected
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01805054152 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70105591553 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8445814925 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292994449084 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986429697486 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445399221808 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171130678221 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254188819932 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.