Some people believe that young people bring more profits to a company. Other say that older people actually bring more profits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Employees are of paramount significance in success of a company. However, there are predominantly two contrasting views where one section of society vehementaly deems that younglings contribute more profits to a company while others emphasize that the older employees considerably makes more profits.
Apparently, various factors makes a section of society advocate that the novices have more potential to attain higher return for company and have numerous reasons to substantiate it. First and foremost, the new generation have more energy which act as a key influencing factor in performing the tasks efficiently. Seemingly, the potential energy put towards targets substantially contributes to prolific increase in profit of a firm. Secondly, the young employees are blessed with the ability to comprehend modern epoch changes easily.According to BBC, a study revealed that 60% of companies recruit young employees, the reason being adaptability to technological upgradations. Thirdly, despite of less experience the novices posses the quality of being multitaskers. Seemingly, in the contemporary era employers prefer to hire youngster because of their versatility which resultantly gives a exponential rise to a firms revenue. To vindicate, being able to perform various jobs at one time is a prominent factor which adds on advantage in resume of a candidate to be hired in this cut throat competition.
On the other hand, some believe that elder people have more potential resulting in greater return to company for myriad reasons. Chiefly, experience is a significant deriving factor behind the success of a company which is majorly found in matured employees. Although, new generation employees are well versed with technology, yet lacks behind in terms of experience which leads to potential problems in smooth running of a company. Moreover, elderly people are considered to be more stable in retaining a position in a job whereas young workers are less loyal and change their jobs frequently. At the outset, it can have a catastrophic effect on expenses of company which is incurred repeatedly in recruiting candidates. To corroborate, 70% of multinational companies choose to hire highly experienced people so that the persons can perform a job for a longer period.
In my profound and sagacious opinion companies are in rat race of earning higher revenues which significantly depends on the type of employees they recruit. I believe that both generations have their own favourable benefits to company which employers can consider while selecting. Age is a mere number, talent and skill matters which should be highly preferred irrespective the age of candidate. Even though some companies follows a set age range, they sometimes change the selections to reap the benefits of high profits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 536, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
... comprehend modern epoch changes easily.According to BBC, a study revealed that 60% of co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 892, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eir versatility which resultantly gives a exponential rise to a firms revenue. To...
^
Line 2, column 916, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'firms'' or 'firm's'?
Suggestion: firms'; firm's
...sultantly gives a exponential rise to a firms revenue. To vindicate, being able to pe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to reap the benefits of high profits.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2373.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 434.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46774193548 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1076628914 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7157713159 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.894736842 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203371951607 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579661257071 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656427580721 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12624067968 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524050376604 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.