Some people say that modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
Technology can be found everywhere. Smart devices have become integral part of our lives, from reading news to purchasing groceries, everything is tap away. Many people believe that digital media will entirely substitute traditional newspaper. This essay will discuss pros and cons of both scenarios.
To begin with, digital media is consumed by vast numbers of people. Today, people can read local as well as world news from multiple online sources, one can not only read news but also listen to the articles for free or with nominal subscription fee. People can easily search for specific news on the internet, watch videos of the incident and gather information, which will diminish the need to preserve old newspapers. In fact, current pandemic has resulted in mass purchase of smart devices, people have started reading ePaper to avoid the spread of infections. Moreover, local publishers like Divya Bhaskar has launched mobile apps in which people can read traditional format of newspaper digitally.
However, reading news in a conventional way has splendid feeling. Newspapers mainly contains news but it has multiple puzzles like crosswords, sudoku, these benefits such as learning vocabulary and improves cognitive ability. Reading on smart devices can be eye stressing whereas newspaper has no such harmful characteristics. Additionally, fake news rapidly spread through social media, the authenticity of news cannot be verified.
To conclude, although modern technology will eventually replace traditional newspaper, with the new launches of advanced form factor in smart devices it will replace physical form of newspaper but conventional way of reading continue to improve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a conventional way" with adverb for "conventional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...per digitally. However, reading news in a conventional way has splendid feeling. Newspapers mainly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uthenticity of news cannot be verified. To conclude, although modern technology ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal way of reading continue to improve.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, in fact, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58139534884 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81628024333 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5317522702 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185996685429 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063921436602 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068461812978 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132157590879 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778910001008 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.